Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Napier (porn star)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep Tatarian (talk) 20:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jack Napier (porn star)[edit]
- Jack Napier (porn star) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 17:50, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep: nearly a halve million hits on google, 174 films listed at imdb...and the enormity of his penis alone, i would think are sufficient enough to meet wp notability requirements. --emerson7 19:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I have no idea what the size of his you know what, has to do with this afd. Is this guy even passing WP:N, and even if as the nominator says this fails WP:PORNBIO.-Marcusmax(speak) 20:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Does not pass WP:PORNBIO. Passing coverage found in AVN and XBiz and an Urban Spice Award nomination. I don't think that's deep enough or significant enough. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. Has had a reasonable amount of independant coverage. Epbr123 (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep One of the top interracial performers in porn. The movies he directed and performed in are consistently covered by the porn trade journals, AVN and XBIZ. Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Epbr123. Epbr123's improvements are enough for WP:CREATIVE. • Gene93k (talk) 20:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.