Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack King (author)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jack King (author)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source, which was placed only after trying to PROD. There is no claim of notability. There is no notability that can be determined as per specific and general notability guidelines. Cerejota (talk) 11:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Aside from the one cited Publishers Weekly review, I can't see any coverage. No awards, shortage of reviews, no general press coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. There's nothing out there other than the PW source, at least nothing that we can use to show notability. He seems to have largely flown under the radar as far as RS go.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.