Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Anthony Ewins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Anthony Ewins[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These same concerns also apply to Ewins' creative partner, article found at:

Not notable under WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Two reliable sources cover solely in the context of being "ascended fanboys" who got noticed for their JW fansite and hired by Universal. No other significant coverage. Otherwise the page, before cleanup, was almost entirely a promotional summary of the sites they created.

On an additional note: the article was moved from draftspace by an account that had been dormant for 10 years, only to come back and begin writing about both Ewins and Glover on Jurassic World articles. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC); edited 21:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that if the subjects were just "marketers" there would be little reason for a Wikipedia page. However, Trevorrow has publicly stated in a previous tweet that they are "creative consultants". Given they've significantly shaped the Jurassic canon there are grounds to push them as creative writers/Jurassic consultants, given the uniqueness of their roles. Further coverage now includes: https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/perth-mans-incredible-ride-to-hollywood-on-the-back-of-dinosaurs-ng-b88896456z - howzat_out 13:03, 14 July 2018 UTC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howzat out (talk • contribs)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:24, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:MILL. How would any reasonable editor think these are notable people? 22:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete consultants of any kind are amonst never notable for being such. Nothing suggests that Ewins is an exception for this rule.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.