Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Alexander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete All. Nishkid 64 02:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Alexander

Non notable unsourcable, cruft. Also all characters are mentioned in similar detail on the main series page so articles are redundant and unexpandable. Daniel J. Leivick 00:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons.

Delete per nom, quite possibly able to condense and merge into a parent article or character page. I don't see a reason to have it on wikipedia but as it goes with articles on games exceptions could be made, just so long as WP guidelines aren't completely ignored. It is often quite hard to find appropriate third party sources, in those cases one or two articles could survive if they have been well prepared. But without sources, references, formatting, templates, and links it’s just a worthless paragraph.-- wtfunkymonkey 00:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The articles are already merged into the Hitman series page, these articles are entirely redundant. --Daniel J. Leivick 03:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, redundant. Terence Ong 04:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per Terence Ong. Avalon 05:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete allper above. Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 08:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. ← ANAS ^Talk? 20:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Big top 21:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all- no need for the characters of one edition of a video game to have their own articles. I would say merge, but it seems like they already are. --TeckWiz^TalkContribs_@ 23:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.