Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JNode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 21:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JNode[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Contested PROD) No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The article cites no independent sources, and I have been unable to find coverage in independent reliable sources. (Also, when searching for sources, it is necessary to be careful, as some hits for "Jnode" appear to refer to completely different uses of the same name.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A google search gave me nothing to prove notability.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up blogs and forum posts but no significant RS coverage of the subject.Dialectric (talk) 11:27, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.