Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JIRC (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JIRC[edit]

JIRC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous AfD was actually an archaic Votes for Deletion discussion back in 2004. Notability guidelines were not well established at that time. jIRC was/is a fairly obscure IRC client and is several years defunct. Fails the software notability guidelines. Safiel (talk) 02:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  04:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  04:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I simply see nothing better not to mention it was deleted once before with no better improvement now. Notifying past AfD commenter Postdlf. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The only sources that come up are old personal websites listing IRC clients; books discussing IRC clients, such as the sources for PJIRC, gloss over this one. Fails WP:NSOFT. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.