Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JC Gonzalez
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- JC Gonzalez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ENT Ueutyi (talk) 05:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - This person does seem to have had some small roles in TV series, but Google reveals no particular coverage. Obviously with any teenpop musical figure one runs the risk that his fanbase and coverage is on some hyper-hip social network and TV channel the existence of which has yet to reach me and I'll be remembered forevermore as the person who voted to delete the first Wikipedia article on the next Taylor Swift...but I don't see it. In addition, the article's is not good-lots of unsourced WP:PROMO language. May be a case of WP:TOOSOON but I really don't see it being worth keeping now. Blythwood (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as this seems obvious, not currently even minimally better satisfying WP:CREATIVE and no better sourcing with that. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete; no evidence of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Closing admin, please note the presence of Portal:JC Gonzalez, which should be speedy deleted; it will qualify for WP:P1 if we delete the article, and it already qualifies for WP:P2 because we have "fewer than three non-stub articles" related to the topic of JC Gonzalez. Nyttend (talk) 14:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ha, I just nominated it--oddly, though, I was unable to enter a criterion. Drmies (talk) 17:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- *ZOT*ed. DMacks (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ha, I just nominated it--oddly, though, I was unable to enter a criterion. Drmies (talk) 17:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. Curro2 (talk) 15:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. No significant coverage by independent reliable sources. — CactusWriter (talk) 18:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Almost all refs provided were imdb or youtube. There's only one article that covers him in any depth and one article isn't enough to satisfy GNG. I tried searching Google for more references, as the article gives the impression this person is a reasonably well-known actor in Colombia, but found nothing. Although it does appear there's an SEO campaign to get his name out into Google... Kindzmarauli (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as definitely not notable. Kharkiv07 (T) 20:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, fails WP:ENT ukexpat (talk) 03:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't meet WP:ENT criteria. -- Chamith (talk) 04:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.