Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.k.rolwing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Redirect. I'm going to be bold here and redirect the article since, as Canley points out, this is not an entirely improbable search term, and it appears the nominator is a fairly new user who may not have been aware to redirect rather than nominate for AfD outright. Will leave a note on their page. Non-admin close. Redfarmer (talk) 00:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J.k.rolwing

Already exists. I think. Me what do u want? _{Your Hancock Please} 23:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Redirect to J. K. Rowling. I was about to do this when I edit conflicted with you. Redfarmer (talk) 23:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it'd serve any purpose as a redirect, given a.) the misspelling and b.) the lack of spacing. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to tag as speedy. speedy delete as housekeeping, useless redirect/nonsense. special, random, Merkinsmum 23:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So was I, but I undid it. I guess then I'll undo my undo, this falls under nonsense I guess. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that it would fall under nonsense. Maybe housekeeping if the consensus is that a redirect would serve no purpose? Redfarmer (talk) 23:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll wait then. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy redirect I don't think this is too implausible as a typo and redirects are cheap. --Canley (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.