Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. K. Engineers & Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 04:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J. K. Engineers & Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the facts in this article are in the infobox, which is copied from the Infosys article. Similarly, the references in this article are the first two from the Infosys article. Going by the contents of said infobox, the company would have to employ almost the entire population of the city in which it is headquartered. I have no doubt that this is a real company, but it is this one, which I don't think is yet notable enough for an article.

(NB. this article has previously been declined for speedy deletion.) Kateshortforbob _talk 15:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Surely this should go (and should have gone already) either as a hoax article (claiming Infosys results as their own) or as consisting of text duplicated from the Infosys article without appropriate attribution? At any rate no evidence of WP:CORPDEPTH notability. AllyD (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This is not a complete hoax. A Google search shows directory listings for a J. K. Engineers & Company in Ankleshwar, India. They make heat exchangers. However, I don't see a credible assertion of notability. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable: all I can find are routine listings.TheLongTone (talk) 11:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.