Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jürgen Radel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jürgen Radel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not a notable academic per WP:NPROF, not high number of publication, no high impact/citation, no prestigious awards, not in the news, all the sources are primary with no in-depth coverage from reliable sources FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. References 6–12 (seven of them!) are all to the same publication in various languages. That looks like padding to me. It would be sufficient to keep [6] and mention that other versions exist. Athel cb (talk) 16:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
to be honest, I should have PROD the article rather than using XFD given how obvious this one is, but here we are FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NPROF, his h-index score on Google Scholar is 4, and is 0 on Scopus; his position is not a named chair or distinguished professorship, no other indication of rank. Fails GNG also. Netherzone (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Delete, very low h-index score, indicaiton of non-notability. Oaktree b (talk) 17:25, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Management. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:Netherzone. Mooonswimmer 17:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. h-index of only 4, nothing else to indicate passing WP:PROF. The page reads rather promotional. Nsk92 (talk) 22:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. One paper with 160 citations in GS, but not seeing anything else of note. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see evidence of passing any WP:PROF criterion. I've seen some editors argue that all German full professors in established full-professor positions are notable under #C3 but I don't subscribe to that expansive philosophy. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.