Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jürgen Czarske (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jürgen Czarske

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially failing WP:NPROF. Only 1 paper above 100 citations but plenty of other stuff which may swing it. Deleted in 2013 for similar reasons. scope_creep^Talk 20:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The citation record still does not look particularly impressive, but since the 2013 nomination (in which my opinion was to delete) he has been elected as a fellow of several major societies such as OSA and SPIE in which this is enough of an honor, I think, to pass WP:PROF#C3. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good enough for me. Nomination Withdrawn

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.