Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/József Boda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 16:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

József Boda[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has played 158 mins of professional football, giving presumed notability under WP:NFOOTBALL but otherwise spent most of his career in the amateur third tier of Hungarian football. During a WP:BEFORE search centred on Hungarian sources I found this trivial mention and this piece in a blog. Blogs generally aren't given as much weight as WP:RS in a deletion discussion so I believe that Boda József fails WP:GNG and should be deleted as per consenus at many similar AfDs. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He does not meet any reasonable notability guidelines. We need to fix our currently absurd football notability guidelines so they will be reasonable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - total game time is less than 2 matches, and there is clear consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALl is insufficient when GNG is failed. Giant Snowman 17:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Conducting a WP:BEFORE search reveals nothing reliable and significant. Of the opinion when a subject doesn't pass the basic notability requirements (WP:N minus all those SNG's) nothing found anywhere else should be sufficient to make that specific subject notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Take it to a blog or some other site if you want it on the internet. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --ARose Wolf 17:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current sources doesn't indicate WP:GNG. Cuoxo (talk) 19:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.