Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Józef Kos (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of centenarians (military commanders and soldiers). Star Mississippi 15:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Józef Kos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Private soldier of the German and Polish armies. Long and worthy of respect life. But I'm not sure if meets our notability requirements. According to this article when Józef Kos died at the age of 107, he was "only" the second oldest person in the voivodeship, not to mention a country. Marcelus (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Poland. Marcelus (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to List of centenarians (military commanders and soldiers). Prior AfD in 2007 which I started was a snow keep but with everyone just repeatign that 'being 106 years old is sufficient to make someone notable'. Well, our standards have risen since, I am afraid, and we require significant coverage in RS. What we have instead is a bunch of obituaries in local news. No pl wiki article. The subject fails WP:NBIO. But we have a valid list he should be mentioned in and redirected there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.