Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iwaspoisoned.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iwaspoisoned.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My extensive PROD removed removed by SPA account with the sole comments of "1. The site is endorsed by the International Association for Food Protection - link to endorsement now added, related to the 2016 conference where the founder was a guest speaker. 2. Added another article wh...." and none of that satisfies what it takes for actual notability here, and how the article is such an unconvincing advertisement, it should not have been accepted in the first place. Note, the sources added along with the PROD removal are both unconvincing, this and this which are (1) and a trivial guide which only casually mentions them thrice and (2) a trivial passing mention (something that was noted in the PROD and also what the sources all consisted of, as it is). As it is, it's clear this was started as an advertising-motivated and business-listing-intiated and that's not tolerable, especially when all that could literally be offered as news sources were casual mentions! SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Even though I really want to say WP:ITSUSEFUL as a public health service. Clearly no name recognition and only passing coverage, this is neither helpful nor notable. 157.235.66.80 (talk) 17:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Interesting service. Honestly it could be useful to see the service become notable. At the same time, this is WP:TOOSOON. No notability yet. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a vanity page of an unremarkable web site / business. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.