Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Van Norman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to King of the Nerds. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ivan Van Norman[edit]
- Ivan Van Norman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am having a really hard time seeing any notability here WP:ANYBIO. Am I missing something? Ad Orientem (talk) 05:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deletechanging to Redirect as per RCLC below. Fails notability and also verifiability. (I have serious doubts about some of the stuff in the article - fire dancer??) There is lots about this person in social media and self-generated sites, but absolutely nothing at Google News that seems to be about this person. --MelanieN (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. No reasonable notability presented. Being once a contestant is no fame. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to King of the Nerds; the subject has received significant coverage by way of being a contestant on a nationally televised program, and thus the subject falls under WP:BLP1E, where all the coverage has been due to the subject being a contestant. A redirect to the television program is a common outcome when the subject has only received significant coverage through the program.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.