Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Bujagic
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 20:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ivan Bujagic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recreation of an article mere hours after it was deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a football manager who fails WP:GNG and who has not managed a club in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - He hasn't played/ managed in a Fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps either therefore he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. IJA (talk) 22:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of notability. Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and obviously fails WP:NFOOTBALL.Wikicology (talk) 06:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 20:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.