Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italy '90 Soccer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 14:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Italy '90 Soccer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable unofficial video game with only mentions in articles about the company itself. Gabe114 (talk) 13:40, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Football. Gabe114 (talk) 13:40, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I was able to find multiple reviews on Archive.org: Aktueller Software Markt, Videogame & Computer World, The Games Machine, Commodore Gazette, and MC Microcomputer. Meets GNG. Waxworker (talk) 14:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Waxworker and WP:NEXIST. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources identified above. Seems to be ok. Oaktree b (talk) 22:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Waxworker, seems to be enough. Govvy (talk) 09:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:35, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per the sources found by Waxworker. Timur9008 (talk) 22:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Waxworker. Partofthemachine (talk) 22:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above. Giant Snowman 10:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above. --El Pantera (talk) 08:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It seems to be a WP:SNOWBALL now. Archrogue (talk) 20:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.