Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italo house
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Italo house (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
another blend of various genres. No clear description of what it sounds like or how it is unique. Unreferenced for 6 years, and nearly every artist mentioned is a red link. Ridernyc (talk) 10:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sorry Rider, but this one is clearly notable--I added some references to the article and took the trash out; there are plenty more references available. BTW, no COI here--I can't tell you how much I hated this kind of music! Drmies (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't see any problem with this one. It did get sourced by Drmies, and there is also a page on Italian progressive rock. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 06:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- not sure what the existence of a Italian progressive rock article has to do with this debate. Ridernyc (talk) 09:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I was saying that there are notable pages that exist that focus on pre-existing genres and their scenes in Italy. That may or may not be irrelevant, but I thought it suitable at the time. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 18:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- the Italian progressive article is a mess and unreferenced this is a classic example of why you don't make WP:OTHERSTUFF statements. Ridernyc (talk) 19:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So it isn't a suitable argument then. Sorry about breaking that otherstuff rule; I'll keep that rule in mind. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 19:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- the Italian progressive article is a mess and unreferenced this is a classic example of why you don't make WP:OTHERSTUFF statements. Ridernyc (talk) 19:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I was saying that there are notable pages that exist that focus on pre-existing genres and their scenes in Italy. That may or may not be irrelevant, but I thought it suitable at the time. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 18:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.