Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's not you, it's me.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was not redirect, it's delete. This isn't really a plausible search term, so a redirect wouldn't make much sense. --Core des at 00:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not you, it's me.[edit]

The phrase "It's not you, it's me" does not seem to me to be a subject of encyclopedic merit. —Encephalon 08:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's a well-used phrase, but it doesn't really have anything encyclopaedic behind it, nor would I imagine can one find many references to it as a phrase as opposed to it simply being used. The example conversation made me laugh, though. GassyGuy 09:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MER-C 11:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Would be a weak candidate for a Dictionary of Phrases. No place in an encyclopeadia. Emeraude 12:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to George Costanza or Seinfeld if somebody does search for it. FrozenPurpleCube 13:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Not-encyclopedic, so redirect to George Costanza because Seinfeld fans may search for it. Hello32020 14:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it needs to be redirected, it should be redirected to something like Category:Unbelievably common phrases from the 1980s, not anything to do with Seinfeld. It was a massive, massive cliche long before George Constanza got ahold of it. --Charlene.fic 21:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. As much as I like Seinfeld, this redirect wouldn't be terribly sensible. GassyGuy 22:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. --FaerieInGrey 20:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Charlene.fic. ENeville 22:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete while fairly common, I'd be hard pressed to find a reason to write an encyclopedia article about it. Danny Lilithborne 23:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Charlene.fic. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 00:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no place here. M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 01:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I would say it belongs on UrbanDictionary, but it's probably already there. And it is not sufficiently associated with Seinfeld that it would be a sensible redirect. Haikupoet 04:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Don't redirect to Seinfeld or George Costanza per Charlene.fic. I would suggest redirecting to Relationship breakup, but who's gonna type this phrase, period and all (note there is a period), in a search box? Pan Dan 04:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tentatively keep until somebody comes up with a good place to merge it. Everyking 07:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.