Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Funny, but Not Very Creative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Five Iron Frenzy. Whether and what to merge from the history is for editors to determine. Sandstein 09:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's Funny, but Not Very Creative[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found a few websites selling the EP but none actually describing it in reliable sources. It was self-released and limited in number; it certainly fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge to the band's article. It does appear to be quite a rare release, and plenty of sites talk about it, but I don't see enough RS for a standalone article, so it can be covered in the band's article, per common sense and WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 07:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the band's article. The album is not independently notable and the article contains no encyclopedically relevant prose to consider it worth merging. The article is largely this:

Only 500 copies were made, and copies have been reported as being sold for as high as $250 on eBay

which is unreliably cited. Not suitable for merging. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.