Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IssueTrackerProduct
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
IssueTrackerProduct[edit]
- IssueTrackerProduct (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 17:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. CouldNotComeUpWithAnOriginalName. 17:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Not mentioned in any books (on Zope or otherwise). Some mentions in blogs, but that's it. Pcap ping 17:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge. Open-source (ZPL-licensed) software. Samboy (talk) 03:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - cannot find any third party reliable sources to attest to notability. Theserialcomma (talk) 14:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find no coverage about it in reliable sources. Being Open Source does not mean it is automatically notable. -- Whpq (talk) 17:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Samboy. Also, no sources presented means no article. Miami33139 (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.