Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IssueBurner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 14:00, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IssueBurner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient evidence that it meets the notability criteria: no assertion of notability per WP:GNG; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources; borderline WP:SPAM. Proposed deletion contested by WP:Single-purpose account. Gurt Posh (talk) 12:37, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Gurt Posh (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Also advertising for rather run of the mill software: an integrated help desk & issue tracking software. It is known for its ease of use & tight email integration. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability and no significant coverage online to be found with Google. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable software. SL93 (talk) 23:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't find any notable third-party sources for this software, more than half of those sources are a conflict of interest. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.