Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel vs Genocide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Nick-D (talk) 01:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Israel vs Genocide

Opinion piece. First prodded as such, then tagged as nonsense. It is indeed not clear what the author's point is. Unencyclopedic no matter how you look at it. Strong delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete: I think the goal of the uploading user is pointed out in the emboldened capital letters at the start: pure POV. -- role^player 00:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Definitely not neutral point of view and I'm not sure that it can be rescued. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Pertinent information here belongs in the Israel article or in articles relating to Israel's conflicts. Talmage (talk) 00:54, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Whatever might possibly worth saving in this pile of dung should be incorporated (if it is not already) into other articles. Un school 01:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Relevant info---should be kept in some form, if not word for word in current form. Do not delete.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.193.34 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note above comment added by me after being posted on the article itself by the above user. -- role^player 01:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, I did NOT make a title such as "Israel vs Palestinian genocide" because this is not about generalizing "all" Palestinians, nor "all" Arabs, it is Israel vs the UNDISPUTED (no "POV" here!) danger of Genocide from a few fronts. Thank you, and a happy new year to all. Ygorisos (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wikipedia is not your soapbox. Proxy User (talk) 06:13, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Can the article be renamed and improved? Perhaps to Israeli Genocide or Israeli Conflicts or Persecution of Israel? I'm on the fence. Talmage (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment And that would not make it any less of an unacceptable WP:POV opinion piece. Wikipedia is not your soapbox. Take it someplace else. Proxy User (talk) 06:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pretty obvious WP:POV pushing. Reso lute 05:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious WP:POV opinion piece. Unencyclopedic no matter how you look at it. Proxy User (talk) 06:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This conflict is already covered neutrally elsewhere in Wikipedia. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks to me like POV pushing at its best. Israel's conflicts and differences with its neighbouring countries have already been covered in the relevant articles already, and in a more neutral way too. We definitely don't need this. Chamal ^talk 14:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hopelessly "point of view". The flip side is that Israel is bombing the hell out of Palestinian neighborhoods in Gaza. But it's being done in a benevolent manner. Mandsford (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without question. Should probably be a Speedy Delete. Timneu22 (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball Delete—Bigoted propaganda rant. Violates WP:NOT.—RJH (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously POV, but good information that WP is lacking. Guy0307 (talk) 18:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy as per Wikipedia:Userfication#Userfication_of_deleted_content travb (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, irredeemably POV. Stifle (talk) 19:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One might edit a bit but the base of it all is very factual and neutral, it is just trying to explain the very danger Israel faces.

As to "being covered elsewhere", not really, this aspect of fighting for survival against genocide, nothing about that was covered, yet. Guys3000 (talk) 19:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)— Guys3000 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.