Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismat Beg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ismat Beg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines PROFTEST and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib (talk) 07:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources
Google Scholar shows they have been cited 3,355 times, with an h-index of 30
  • The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level
A gold medal from the Pakistan Academy of Sciences is a prestigious national award.
  • The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association
He is one of the 100 fellows of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences, a highly selective body that elects no more than five new fellows per year.
  • The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research
He is a distinguished professor at Lahore School of Economics. List of academic ranks#Pakistan confirms the significance of being a Distinguised National Professor in the country.
  • The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area
He is the editor of 12 journals.
WP:NACADEMIC states that 'once the facts establishing the passage of one or more of the notability criteria above have been verified through independent sources, non-independent sources, such as official institutional and professional sources, are widely accepted as reliable sourcing for routine, uncontroversial details.' Therefore once any one of the NACADEMIC criteria have been shown to be met through independent sources, the other claims in the article can be verified through non-independent sources. 'if an academic is notable under this guideline, his or her failure to meet either the General Notability Guideline or other subject-specific notability guidelines is irrelevant.' Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.