Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic comparative religion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. W.marsh 00:39, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic comparative religion[edit]

The article completely lacks substance apart from the links to several pages related to the Islamic view of Christianity. On top of that, the article presents no evidence that the field of studies known as "Islamic comparative religion" actually exists. Must be deleted as a stub devoid of any unique content. Pecher ^Talk 17:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As nominator. Pecher ^Talk 17:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep "Islamic comparative religion" yields a lot of google hits relating to precisely the topic. It is clearly not a small field, and can be expanded upon significantly. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 19:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems pretty useful. Aucaman^Talk 21:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Self evident Keep. --Striver 00:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep This seems like a valid article, but it needs serious work as it is basically a collection of links. kotepho 01:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above --Khoikhoi 02:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above James 08:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens. Pepsidrinka 13:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - but in clear need of Expansion --Irishpunktom\^talk 12:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.