Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islami Bank International School & College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:12, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Islami Bank International School & College[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable institution. Article replete with primary and unreliable sources. Peter Ormond 💬 22:25, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Ormond: I'm sure that no sources of these article is unreliable. And how do you know that these schools are non-notable? These schools are one of the the most famous schools in Bangladesh. You are not a residence of Bangladesh. So you don't know it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tajwar.thesuperman (talk • contribs) 04:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cite reliable sources to establish notability. Peter Ormond 💬 08:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insubstantial and non independent RSDeathlibrarian (talk) 06:13, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cannot find any independent reliable sources detailing this school in English or using the Bengali name for the school given in the article. If a Bengali speaker can find any reliable sources meeting the WP:GNG guidelines, I'm happy to change my vote. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 11:41, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (copied from elsewhere): If the guidance at WP:IKI applies to Bangladeshi schools as well, then Nursery-X schools (as this one is) are generally considered notable. Ref the WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES RFC, however, schools need significant independent coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate how they meet WP:NORG / WP:GNG - it cannot be presumed. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 03:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (Copied from my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhaka Cantonment Board Adarsha Bidyaniketon) An essay largely written in 2013 cannot override the wide community consensus of the WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES RfC; in the absence of sources we can't presume this is notable. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is a mess. At best, nuke it and start over. Minkai (talk to me) 12:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.