Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam Zinda Baad Platform
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Islam Zinda Baad Platform[edit]
- Islam Zinda Baad Platform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't believe that this political party is notable. It seems to be a one man band that has stood once, receiving very few votes. Outside one piece in the local press, the only other coverage I can find is a tabloid hit piece about Salim:[1]. Fences&Windows 20:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 20:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 20:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 20:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As a single candidate appears to constitute the entire political party, and that candidate fails WP:POLITICIAN by a long way, I can't see any grounds to keep this. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I have not yet heard any rumours to suggest that he (or the party) are thinking of standing in the forthcoming election, so as it stands it is a 'one hit wonder' I agree that the party does not satisfy notability policy. I agree that the only option is deletion. doktorb wordsdeeds 07:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Despite registration with the Electoral Commission, this is obviously a very minor polical party, probably consisting of one would-be politician and his election committee, essentially a one-man band. It got 309 votes in 2005, no doubt largely from his mosque and his friends. The apparent link to its leader goes to a dabpage, which does not seem to refer to this leader. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.