Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isha Malviya (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CLOSED
I do not see a consensus to delete. Deb (talk) 07:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Isha Malviya[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Isha Malviya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ()
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NACTOR. References are primary, early stage PR, puff pieces. Note tag added several weeks ago.

Also, The actress has only one notable role that is in Udariyaan. Too early for a Wikipedia page. Alos Bigg Boss doesn't confirm your wiki page, for instance even Priyanka Chahar Chaudhary doesn't have a page yet despite having done more work than Malviya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hey Angie (talk • contribs) March 10, 2024, 14:28 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete Agree as per above. Xegma(talk) 07:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.117.242.82.161 (talk) 10:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Sourcing suggests notability is not met. Stifle (talk) 09:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think the article should stay as there are reliable sources available, backing her article. She may have appeared on 2 shows, but these are what made her a known face. Besides this, She had appeared on several advertisements, over 10 Music videos which should count too. --Princessruby (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Lacks significant coverage and notibility. Imsaneikigai (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes this page should be deleted immediately there is no significant work apart from 1-2 shows.No credible sourcing.page should be deleted Hestest1234 (talk) 03:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Well sourced. Also, WP:NEXIST. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment At least one of the comments made here is not in good faith. The IP 117.242.82.161 has stated that "I agree I am a fan of Priyanka which is why it hurts me that actresses like Nimrit Kaur Ahluwalia and Isha Malviya who didn't pass WP:NACTOR have a Wikipedia page but Priyanka doesn't" AusLondonder (talk) 11:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There's some reasonable sourcing at the article, seems to be quite a bit more available online, although it can be hard to weed out trivial celebrity gossip. While coverage of her participation in Bigg Boss is less useful there is some decent coverage of her role in Udaariyaan, which she won an award for at the Indian Telly Awards. The fact she had an interview with the Times of India suggests she's not just a regular reality television contestant. AusLondonder (talk) 11:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If we see in that way even Priyanka Choudhary's article creation should be allowed because the draft I presented in the DRV has reasonable sourcing and her works do suggest that she's not just a regular star but a television actress who passes WP:NACTOR. What kind of injustice is this? 117.209.242.154 (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly isha malviya page should be deleted i feel doing bigg boss and some music videos doesn't not mean your wikipedia page should be created.Just appeal and i think
    @her wiki page will be deleted Hestest1234 (talk) 06:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep A clear case of jealousy from fans of Chahar Choudhary who are not happy with the fact that Malviya and Ahluwalia have pages while she doesn’t. Sufficient coverage and work profile. OCDD (talk)
  • Comment Nobody is jealous over here. We were just stating facts Isha Malviya and Nimrit Kaur Ahluwalia do not pass WP:NACTOR no matter how hard their fans try to deny it. If Malviya and Ahluwalia articles are allowed in Wikipedia then it is fair that even Priyanka Choudhary's article should be allowed. 117.209.242.154 (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete 103.190.13.4 (talk) 18:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As I already stated I am not a sockpuppet of any user in Wikipedia. I have been editing Wikipedia since 2019 with the IP address which starts with 117, the other numbers keep changing.
    You can cross-check with the IP address of @Hey Angie or @Hestest1234 or any user whom you believe I'm a sockpuppet of.
    I would also like to add that all these accusations against me will not change the fact that Isha Malviya and Nimrit Kaur Ahluwalia do not pass WP:NACTOR.

117.230.22.80 (talk) 14:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment:

    I have also noticed that the user IP (User talk:117.209.242.154) has previously tried making page for Priyanka. Could be a sock of Hey Angie

    I can't be repeating this everywhere for the Nth time. So whoever wants to hurl more accusations on me please read what I am writing now.
    If I or any of my editor friends had wished for creating an article on Priyanka Choudhary then we would have easily done it before going to WP:DRV as the topic is not salted, however we did not do that and chose to maintain WP: CIVILity and WP: good faith. Please don't insult us or our edits without learning the actual rootcause.117.230.22.80 (talk) 14:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: All I want to add here is that I mentioned Priyanka's name only because she and Isha worked in the same show and nothing else. Also I do not have any sockpuppet or other account. Also beside this fan war, there is a simple point - The page does not pass any criteria. Thank you, hope you all understand my ponit here!

(Hey Angie) (talk) 04:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC) Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NACTOR. This page does not pass any criteria. Why this page is still kept. It should be deleted with immediate effect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hestest1234 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This page completely looks a creation by PR, addition of puffery like 'youngest model' with no source, or citing paid articles all looks as paid editing. Even her boyfriend Samarth Jurel article looks the same, I have nominated it too for deletion. This Seems to be a case of WP:PAID or a fanpage creating a page. Imsaneikigai (talk) 11:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 07:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.58.64.168 (talk) [reply]

  • Comment: Yes @Imsaneikigai, I too request you to nominate Nimrit Kaur Ahluwalia page too for deletion. It too fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NACTOR and is fan made. Infact, there are many ITV actors whose pages are made just because they participate in the reality show Big Boss and exited the show as regular participants, while the actors who passed WP:SIGCOV, WP:NACTOR and were the second runner-up of the reality show Big Boss doesn't have a Wikipedia page.
If you are an Indian editor of Wikipedia, I kindly request you to please keep a check on such fan made articles of Indian television actors. Appreciate your help in advance.117.230.7.136 (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page is more like a PR work creating a page in hurry just after bigg boss mentioning titles like miss teen and all that clearly shows work of PR Isha malviya page should be deleted as it lack credible sourcing and not much sufficient significant work for wiki page.Delete page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hestest1234 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Isha_Malviya_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1216835459"