Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabella García-Manzo

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 23:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isabella García-Manzo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Isabella García-Manzo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the 2023 pageant, there is no evidence for notability. It is very likely that the page was created/edited for self-promotion. TanookiKoopa (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Beauty pageants, and El Salvador. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep: I found a feature article about her in Vogue and several other news outlets. She meets the requirement for significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Although these sources still need to be added to the article, WP:NEXIST instructs the retention of articles such as this because "notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate presence or citation in an article." Rublamb (talk) 14:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: @Rublamb, would you mind sharing those sources here so we can analyze them? Would like to take a look at them. Let'srun (talk) 23:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reply:: Here you go. Some may be worthless, but I am sure of the top few. Rublamb (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on significance of press coverage alone, seems notable enough for me. Mistamystery (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To consider the sources presented.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Vogue source doesn't count as it is an interview, and the other coverage posted has to do with the pageant itself. Thus, due to WP:BIO1E, I have to go with a Weak Delete on this one, but if coverage extending beyond the pageant can be found, I'd be willing to change my vote. Let'srun (talk) 01:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WP:INTERVIEWS says that interviews "can be considered as evidence of notability", especially when published in a reliable source. It is pretty compeling that this is the cover story of a major magazine. Rublamb (talk) 04:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Isabella_García-Manzo&oldid=1190273565"