Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Opus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Opus[edit]

Isaac Opus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a combined music producer, ordained minister, professor of economics and entrepreneur that has had no reliable sources since creation in 2008 and all I could find were the briefest of mentions. The 2 references recently added are just a listing, and a Gutenburg self published press entry that is referenced to a Wikipedia mirror (World Heritage Encyclopedia, see the first section here) Atlantic306 (talk) 11:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 12:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 12:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 12:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Promotional vanity page created and maintained by multiple IP addresses (possibly same person?) Googling both stage and real name turns up nothing other than the usual self-download/user contributed sites; lacks independent third party recognition. Basically, whatever this subject has achieved is not encyclopedic worthy. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete only mentions that I could find were entirely user-submitted, which is consistent with the edits made to this page. Agree that it's a vanity/promotional article. Rockypedia (talk) 02:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Very promotional page. Notability has not been demonstrated. Lacypaperclip (talk) 03:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.