Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Marshall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 06:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Marshall

Unnotable voice actor. I cannot find any reliable sources about him on Google. The sources on the article are all wikis (or IMDB) and don't include any references either, most likely because there are none. Laurent (talk) 08:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. Making 'conceptual contributions' is meaningless. As a voice-actor, the subject's notability is somewhat dubious. Eddie.willers (talk) 02:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets criteria for WP:Creative. This voice actor has most certainly provided significant contributions to notable productions. Untick (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - In my opinion, he doesn't meet WP:Creative. Even if he indeed contributed to major games such as Donkey Kong Country of Killer Instinct, the article doesn't say what was the extent of his contribution. More importantly, there are no proofs he was actually involved with the design of these games. Laurent (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources makes this article wholly unverifiable, which is against WP:BLP. MLauba (talk) 15:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.