Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Hasson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Hasson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not notable, and lacks any references. It mostly attibutes to IMDB. Severe storm 28 01:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per WP:COMPOSER composers and songwriters may be considered notable if they have credit for writing or co-writing lyrics or music for a notable composition. This person has credit for writing several songs for Selena Gomez and Demi Lovato. The subject meets the notability criteria as a song-writer/composer and so should not have their article deleted. Such-change47 (talk) 01:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we do not have the sources to show a passing of GNG. Wikipedia articles need to be built on reliable, independent secondary sources. IMDb does not count as a useable source, and 1 source is never enough. I am not even sure the other source meets the GNG rules, since when I tried to look at it the link was not working for me. Even if it does though one source is never enough on its own.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a whole 4 hits in GNews, none look like they have anything to do with him. Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 03:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is effectively no sourcing other than IMDB, and the article gives no reason to expect there to be any sourcing. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 03:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.