Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Butterfield (comedian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Butterfield (comedian)[edit]

Isaac Butterfield (comedian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

just a random youtuber FMSky (talk) 11:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FMSky (talk) 11:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:CREATIVE. WWGB (talk) 11:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - clearly not notable.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 15:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - sources show widespread media coverage on several occasions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non notable comedian fails WP:GNG.JeepersClub (talk) 12:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Blocked sock. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I've tightened up the article to only include content that can be reliably sourced, of which there's enough to meet GNG. Cabrils (talk) 23:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He had an Amazon Prime comedy special so must be notable enoughGrapepinky (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - caused some temporary controversy, but no evidence of sustained notability. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO. All the sources I'm able to find are either WP:INTERVIEW sources or passing mentions. WP:BLP1E also appears relevant. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Seems the only thing he is known for is making an occasional controversial remark that might get people talking about him. No seeming lasting contributions. -Pax Verbum 07:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Undelete it please. Patachonica (talk) 23:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.