Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irpin Declaration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After 3 relists still minor participation and no apparent consensus. No prejudice to a re-nomination in 1 or 2 months time if no improvement is forthcoming. Randykitty (talk) 16:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irpin Declaration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources don't establish notability for this organization, nor for it even being an organization. Serafart (talk) (contributions) 23:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote it's a Political Union not an organization TheVoltigeur (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I added a reference from the Kyiv Post, which is considered RS. What's with "claimed" in small text? Elinruby (talk) 20:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well it’s not that either. It’s a declaration, as noted in the text. It might be notable to include in the individual articles of the groups, but it’s not notable alone, and doesn’t meet notability guidelines for an article. Serafart (talk) (contributions) 23:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist111 (talk) 02:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 04:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure draftifying this would help, almost looks TOOSOON. If not, Delete is fine. Oaktree b (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Seems like a notable thing if you search for it in using the local language "Ірпінська декларація" CT55555(talk) 01:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Any sort of notability it seems to have is as a news event, though. Not every news event is worthy of an article, and it seems like this information would be much better suited as a sentence or two as a part of the history section on the articles about the individual groups which either signed or were alleged to have signed the declaration. Serafart (talk) (contributions) 01:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.