Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Ore Cup (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Ore Cup[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would carry forward the deletion arguments made at the first AfD regarding notability and I would add further that this minor rivalry ended after only three seasons. Clearly fails WP:GNG and the appropriate sports notability guidelines. Safiel (talk) 02:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not satisfy the WP:SIGCOV guidelines. The two lead references which aren't currently deadlinks fall under the "routine coverage" definition. In both cases they acknowledge the existence of a trophy, but a trophy alone is not enough to justify an article. I'll also note that in ref No. 4, the "rivalry" is said to exist despite the teams having never played a game – this is obviously intended to be promotional rather than informative – and in ref No. 5 there is reference to a predicted rivalry, not an existing rivalry. Redirection to Gold_Coast_United_FC#Rivalries would also be an acceptable outcome. Aspirex (talk) 05:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not satisfy the WP:SIGCOV guidelines. Ciaran106 (talk) 11:42, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not satisfy the WP:SIGCOV guidelines.–Davey2010^Talk 03:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there seems to be quite a lot of sources confirming the existence of a trophy and a supposed rivalry but there doesn't seem to be enough detailed coverage to warrant an article in its own right. Don't know if redirecting is the right route but a mention in each of the clubs' articles could be an option. Hack (talk) 03:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 17:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Yes the cup exists, but this is simply a marketing tool to generate interest around games (of which there have only been a handful to date), it is not a notable competition in itself. A secondary consideration relates to the trophy as an indication of a rivalry. No indication of any level of significant / reliable coverage (the sort of which is found here) about the rivalry itself. Aspirex's comment above that references exist noting the rivalry before a game was played is key here. Although there are some nascent rivalries in A-League football, a lot of these were artificially created at the league's inception to hype the competition. Fenix down (talk) 08:42, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.