Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Law of Institutions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. m.o.p 19:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Iron Law of Institutions[edit]
- Iron Law of Institutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability, likely self-published; the topic appears to be a concept mentioned on a blog that was then formalized on Wikipedia. While it has mention in other blogs, it does not appear to have any reliable third-party sources. The concept behind the article seems to be logical, but it’s difficult to verify. Buddy23Lee (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —I, Jethrobot drop me a line 22:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. —I, Jethrobot drop me a line 22:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Failure to meet WP: GNG. There are mentions in some books, but these are mentions rather than full discussions of the concept. More importantly, they do not seem to reflect the same political science concept as discussed in the article. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 22:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Original essay. Carrite (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:OR.--JayJasper (talk) 18:49, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Original research. Cannot find reliable sources that give evidence of notability.--EdwardZhao (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.