Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Chef Thailand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:52, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Chef Thailand[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article in its present form does not satisfy television notability. It is little more than a table. It has only one reference. It has no lede section and so does not explain why it is notable or encyclopedic. An effort was made to have the article improved in draft space, but the article was moved back into article space with the non-helpful edit summary "Already deleted permission text and link". Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm very surprised that this passed AfC. If people aren't happy with deleting this, then maybe redirect to Iron Chef where it is already mentioned in enough detail. There don't seem to be any WP:RS to establish notability for this particular version of the show. Spiderone 09:44, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The article did not pass AfC. The creator moved the page themselves, which they are entitled to do so. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify unless and until someone can be bothered to write a passable stub. Notability does not depend on the state of the "article in its present form", per WP:CONTN and WP:NEXIST. That said, I'd say an article with zero prose is right next to CSD#A3 (no content, though the presence of the infobox and tables precludes the application of this CSD criterion), and certainly does not warrant keeping in its current form. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The program is quite notable itself. Here is google news search for the show [1] --Lerdsuwa (talk) 17:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify This looks like a good choice here. The article is newer with an editor working on it. It potentially meets notability, but as the article stands it is not clear. Jeepday (talk) 19:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify, as per the above rationales. Definitely not ready for mainspace. Pity the editor wasn't patient enough to work through the AfC process.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per above. A table... it's just a table. jp×g 05:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.