Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iris van Berne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iris van Berne

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Now let’s see... article has practically no sources. As I tried to look for sources to verify said jobs... (oh would you look at that, NYMAG Model Profiles no longer exist. Just as I said a month ago would happen when you all thought that was a “reliable” source 🙃.) and all that’s out there is “model attends another model’s wedding.” The only job I could find a reliable source for is Oscar de la Renta. One job does not a notable model make. Trillfendi (talk) 17:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nominator, meet the Internet Archive: [1]. Bakazaka (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nominator, Vogue seems to disagree with you about her only having "one job" [2]. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t say she had only one job (read....) I said the only job I could find an independent, reliable source for is Oscar de la Renta and that’s clearly not enough for an article. All you showed was a slideshow of runway images with absolutely no text. What does that do here? Trillfendi (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't find any substantive sources about her beyond the standard profile listings that merely confirm she is in fact a model or passing mentions that she was present at an event. Reywas92^Talk 05:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to have many many profiles, you could say a lot, or even a whole lot spread over the web, but they are mostly profile images. Apart from those, not much coverage. I think fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON. scope_creep^Talk 03:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.