Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene barberis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. statisfies notability. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irene barberis[edit]

Doesn't seem to offer any notability. Repeated recreation following removal due to copyright violations. Oscarthecat (talk) 08:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Considerable improvement since proposal, copyvio+norability issues resolved, so it's a Keep from me now. --Oscarthecat (talk) 20:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not demonstrated through independent referencing, fails WP:ACADEMIC. WWGB (talk) 08:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 08:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 13:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Work in a museum [1] and a number of museum group shows. Meets WP:CREATIVE.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 14:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weakish Keep per Ethico. Johnbod (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now the article has been edited, as Oscar shows in the diff above. Gonzonoir (talk) 16:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, the article is bare bones and still needs work...Modernist (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.