Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iosif Smulsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:29, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iosif Smulsky[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fringe scientist Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 02:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. GS h index = 5. Some work in applied science but so far non-notable. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. If he were a mainstream scientist the lack of citations to his work in Google scholar would make a clear case that he doesn't pass WP:PROF #1, nor any of the other criteria there. I don't think his fringe status entitles him to any relaxation of these criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non notable sicentist, does not meet WP:PROF Aadagger (talk) 12:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Findings and observations of Xxanthippe and David Eppstein speak for themselves. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 14:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.