Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ionică Minune
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Ionică Minune[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ionică Minune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails GNG and NMUSICIAN. BLP with no sources. –Cupper52Discuss! 11:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.–Cupper52Discuss! 11:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.
–Cupper52Discuss! 11:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.–Cupper52Discuss! 11:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.–Cupper52Discuss! 11:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete extraordinary claims require sourcing. We can not just bluntly call him "on of the most respect in the world" with no sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep rather notable, independent sources do exist, mostly in Romanian: a major daily, another major daily, Romanian Cultural Institue, significant art journal, National Radio, major private TV network.Anonimu (talk) 11:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per the multiple reliable Romanian sources identified above that show significant coverage of the subject so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 02:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Sources identified by Anonimu demonstrate WP:SIGCOV. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.