Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invincible Pictures US
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 01:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Invincible Pictures US (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Reads like an advertisement - while some of the projects listed *might* be notable (and award winning), the company itself doesn't seem notable. Article creator's sole contributions have been to this article or to insert mentions of this company. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 08:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 10:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as above Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I believe this company is notabale as i work in the industry and know that many of the great films this company is releasing would never have been distribution were it not for this company. I just started this article and plan to continue expanding on this company's accomplishments, As well as some of the films released by them. I don't consider this blatant advertising as the comany does not recieve any direct benefit from this article.Ash1028 (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)ash1028[reply]
- Ahem. "Formed in 2007 by Thomas Ashley..." Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per CSD#G11. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This company is responsible for award winning works with many notable and Wikipedia referenced articles. There is no more blatant advertising in this article than any other article of a company similar in nature.Ash1028 (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)ash1028[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.