Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inventory +a

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE (per WP:SNOW) Alexf^(talk) 18:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inventory +a[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N: I won't speedy or PROD this because it's somehow software-related, but I do believe you must be quite a geek to think that some taskbar-gadget for Warcraft warrants its own article... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No assertion of notability. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh delete - is there a stronger term than fancruft for this level of player-manual trivia? --Orange Mike | Talk 13:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as something nowhere near encyclopedic. Daniel Case (talk) 14:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable, almost a dictionary definition. -- BenTels (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video game-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
Delete. Note that the link currently goes to a domain name hostage site. That site was "mineskeys.com", which makes me somehow doubt that this was something any World of Warcraft player would actually want to install. There should be no hesitation to speedy or PROD software related articles, especially when they're as marginal as this one. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- reply - there is no applicable speedy category for software, books, movies, albums, etc. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, and far too in-depth to be merged to anywhere else. ---Taelus (Talk) 15:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No way that this passes WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 21:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.