Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intuitive Password (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is: the article may have a little promotional tone, but is about a notable subject. It should be worked upon as pointed our by K.e.coffman. (non-admin closure)usernamekiran(talk) 18:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intuitive Password[edit]

Intuitive Password (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PRODUCT. The PC Mag sources are all by a single author, and I think they are not sufficient for notability. Last AfD was closed as no consensus. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - For lacking coverage in reliable sources. Only source detailing the program is PC magazine. Meatsgains (talk) 01:52, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. Сергей и Марина Бондаренко (2013-11-15). "Пропускной пункт: веб-сервисы для хранения паролей" [Checkpoint: Web services for storing passwords]. ru:3DNews Daily Digital Digest (in Russian). Archived from the original on 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2017-10-11.

      The article notes:

      Intuitive Password — это молодой сервис, запущенный летом этого года. Несмотря на то, что он, как и LastPass, предназначен для хранения паролей и другой конфиденциальной информации, ориентация у него немного иная. В Intuitive Password стоит сохранять сведения, которые нужны не слишком часто, поскольку тут нет ни автоматического сохранения данных, которые вводятся в веб-формах, ни средств для их автоматического заполнения.

      Intuitive Password — это стопроцентное веб-приложение, работающее в браузере. Никаких дополнительных программ для его функционирования скачивать не нужно. Это относится и к мобильным платформам — и на смартфонах, и на планшетах Intuitive Password открывается и работает в любом популярном браузере. Для удобства восприятия предусмотрено три способа отображения интерфейса: для широкоформатных мониторов, планшетов и экранов мобильных телефонов.

      По умолчанию сервис уже предлагает несколько категорий для хранения данных, но можно добавлять и собственные группы. Кроме этого, можно управлять видимостью категорий в общем списке. При добавлении новых записей можно использовать теги и заметки, а затем использовать их при поиске данных.

      Во время регистрации требуется придумать не только пароль, но и секретный вопрос, а также ответ на него. Он используется не для восстановления пароля, как можно было бы предположить, а для защиты учетной записи от несанкционированного доступа. Intuitive Password сохраняет информацию об IP-адресе, который используется для доступа к учетной записи. Если пользователь пытается войти в аккаунт с другого места, сервис запрашивает не только пароль, но и ответ на этот секретный вопрос. Также для повышения безопасности вместо стандартного пароля можно использовать одноразовый, что удобно, например, при работе с компьютером в общедоступных местах. Одноразовые пароли можно сгенерировать заранее в настройках аккаунта и расходовать их по мере необходимости.

      ru:3DNews Daily Digital Digest is an established online Russian-language technology publication founded in 1997.
    2. Vatu, Gabriela (2013-08-04). "Intuitive Password, Secure Tool for Remembering Login Credentials". Softpedia. Archived from the original on 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2017-10-11.

      The article notes:

      So, web apps such as IntuitivePassword can save you a lot of time by simply remembering stuff in your place.

      ...

      The good part about the service is that users can save up various login details in separate categories, such as general, emails, bank details or licenses, while personalized categories can also be created.

      Furthermore, login details can be stored under three big categories, namely “General,” “Network” and “System.”

      The item editor seems fairly easy to use, with a few details to fill out, such as the user name, password and the site it pertains to, but the form depends on the type of account information you want to add. Each individual item can be given an additional layer of protection once a Master Password is created.

      ...

      It’s also possible to set up a secondary email address where you’ll receive notifications every time someone logs into your account or changes any credentials.

      The service also provides a series of single-use codes (which are quite complicated to type) that can be used instead of the password. The generated codes can be used in the span of a few days, but only once.

      ...

      All in all, Intuitive Password is an easy-to-use app, with a clean interface and what looks like strong security in place to protect user data. So, if you’re looking for such an app, you should at least give this one a try.

    3. Tolentino, Mellisa (2016-05-05). "It's World Password Day: Here's top tips and tools". SiliconANGLE. Archived from the original on 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2017-10-11.

      The article notes:

      Intuitive Password (Intuitive Security Systems Pty. Ltd.) is built on AES-256 encryption and protects users from accidental data breaches by ensuring sensitive data is not accessible to anyone else unless given shared access. The free version allows users to store up to 10 logins, share data with up to three users and access basic security.

      Aside from the Basic free version, there are three other paid versions: Express, Advanced and Pro, (AUD$ 2, 5, 15 respectively), which allow users to save more passwords, share with more people and access passwords even without an Internet connection. It also provides basic account security and two-factor authentication for an additional layer of security.

      https://siliconangle.com/about-us/ demonstrates SiliconANGLE has editorial oversight. John Furrier is the executive editor, Robert Hof is the editor-in-chief, and Kristen Nicole and Paul Gillin are managing editors.
    4. Rubenking, Neil J. (2015-05-14). "Intuitive Password 5.0". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2017-10-11.

      This is a very extensive review of Intuitive Password.

    5. Rubenking, Neil J. (2013-08-08). "Intuitive Password". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2017-10-11.

      This is a substantial review of Intuitive Password.

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Intuitive Password to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 04:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep – Meets WP:GNG. In addition to the sources presented above, below are two lengthy reviews and one short one. North America1000 04:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:57, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Since it clearly passed WP:GNG and search yields result beyond the present source. It will improve later. –Ammarpad (talk) 20:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- WP:TOOSOON: launched a year ago. The coverage is launch related and PR driven, lacking WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Weak keep -- the article is still overly promotional; should be stubbified. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Intuitive Password was launched in 2013. Sources are from 2013–2016. Cunard (talk) 18:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless Cunard or someone else actually puts in the references. There have been too many instances of specifying decent references here that never get adding. Ideally, the should be added to the article at the time they are listed here, so people can judge the overall effectiveness. DGG ( talk ) 13:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep on the basis of the added sources. Ithinkthis is borderline ,but acceptable. DGG ( talk ) 08:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - I've struck through my previous vote after Cunard found and added reliable sources. "Weak" keep though since the majority of coverage is PR stuff as K.e.coffman noted. Meatsgains (talk) 15:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Notability has been established. --Michig (talk) 06:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.