Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intolerance and the panarabism connection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Speedy as disparaging article with no other focus, G4 Der Wohltempierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Intolerance and the panarabism connection[edit]

Contested prod, entire article is soapboxing, written like an essay. By its very nature, the article topic cannot be a neutral encyclopedic article. Not a likely search term so no redirect is necessary. Obvious delete. The Seeker 4 Talk 18:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Aside from the obvious violation of Neutrality, this entire article stinks of complaining and lopsided moaning of "bias". Cheers. I'^mperator 18:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:SOAP, WP:NOR, WP:SYNTH, WP:NPOV, WP:GNG, take your pick. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 18:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an attack page composed entirely of original research and synth to create a fork from Pan-Arabism and Arab nationalism. Even the title "... and the panarabism connection" violates NPOV (and makes us sound like discoverthenetworks). Here's a random sample of the garabage in this screed "An Arabist can be referred to 1) someone that is well knowledgeable of Arab culture and nationality but can also be referred to a radical nationalist anti non-Arab or 2) a 'fanatical' supporter of Arabism's wars, dictatorship and bigoted policies." This really should be speedied; originally research attack pages should not go through a lengthy process. Bali ultimate (talk) 19:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would have tagged it for speedy, but no criteria really fits, as it is definately negative, but not a BLP, and it isn't a blatant attack page as such. It is simply a negative essay soapbox, and is here simply because the prod was removed by the author. I do support a speedy delete based on WP:SNOW however. The Seeker 4 Talk 19:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it is an attack on an entire group of people (arabs) filled with borderline racist claims about arabs and their allies that secretly control the british foreign office and the US department of state. I understand there's no clear speedy criteria for this kind of stuff (there should be) but if an admin happens along, i urge them to snowball close and delete, and salt.Bali ultimate (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Found an excellent speedy criteria: Recreation of deleted material, Racism and the panarabism ideology. See this AN/I from february. [1] Probably same guy and same crap. Knew it rang a bell.Bali ultimate (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.