Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. No independent sources, not indexed in any selective database. The long list of databases in the article are all non-selective (Baidu, GScholar), inclusive (DOAJ), or user-contributed (and borderline predatory: Index Copernicus). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." DePRODded by article creator who added a lot of promotional material (see this version) and gave as reason "Journal has been a member of the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE) since 2018 [https://publicationethics.org/members/international-studies-interdisciplinary-political-and-cultural-journal. The journal follows high publication and ethic standards recommended by this organization (this is why it couldn't be regarded as a predatory journal, but instead it is a legitimate scientific journal.)" However, this does not contribute to notability and PROD reason still stands. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As no justification was given by the first/second delete vote this warrants a relisting
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A merge to University of Łódź is also an option. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. I don't think it should be merged to University of Łódź either. Bukharin (talk) 04:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom. Fails NJOURNAL. QED. Britishfinance (talk) 10:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.