Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International State College of the Philippines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Osarius 07:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

International State College of the Philippines

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A little difficult to categorize this one, but I do not feel this meets notability guidelines about either web content or organisations. The article makes no significant claim of importance. I had previously A7'd the article (the original author removed the tag), but I now feel a AfD discussion to be more appropriate to determine consensus. Osarius 10:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philippines. Osarius 10:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Come on, don't give me a hard time. It's actually a current trending satirical meme in the Philippines. I've removed your A7 because the article is still not yet finished and it is intended to be finished within this night. You tagged this deletion under the category under "organizations" and "education", like, c'mon. It's a meme. You didn't even give me a chance first to fix this article before nominating this for deletion. 10:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Pog ing Juan 10:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First off, my nominations aren’t personal, so I’m not giving you, personally, a hard time. Second, as I can see you’ve been an editor on WP for a few years, long enough to know that you shouldn’t remove speedy deletion tags from an article you’ve created, even if you disagree with the nomination. Third, at the time of nomination the article did not meet notability guidelines, whether that was for organisations or web content, hence nomination. We have tags authors can place on articles to say the article is undergoing a major edit, and we also have draftspace available to produce an article to standards before it’s moved to articlespace. Why did you not utilise these? During new page patrolling we have to take the article at face value, and if there’s no indication from the author that it’s incomplete then it’ll get tagged. Osarius 11:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article massively updated since AfD nomination. @Osarius:, you may want to look into the current face value of the article proposed for deletion and kindly tell me if, in the article, there are still needs to be revamped for it to meet at least the "minimum" notability policy guideline of Wikipedia. So far, I have exhausted my best to make it not misleading to the readers. ~Pog ing Juan 17:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.