Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International No Diet Day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International No Diet Day[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undersourced, highly suspect notability, overly promotional tone, unencyclopedic POV and WP:FRINGE pushing. Article has been tagged for serious issues for many years with no improvement. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 18:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Hmmm. FRINGE/NPOV etc. issues mean this can be tagged, but I don't see a need for WP:TNT. Notability is established through a look at GScholar and GBooks sources. Janet Clarkson (24 December 2013). Food History Almanac: Over 1,300 Years of World Culinary History, Culture, and Social Influence. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 431–. ISBN 978-1-4422-2715-6. and Dana K. Cassell; David H. Gleaves (1 January 2009). The Encyclopedia of Obesity and Eating Disorders, Third Edition. Infobase Publishing. pp. 312–. ISBN 978-0-8160-6992-7. are just a tip of the iceberg, the term is well defined, its history is described, and its significance for the "Fat movement" or such seems reasonably high. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per a simple Google Books search with only the article title. SL93 (talk) 22:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.