Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Emerging Sciences
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
International Journal of Emerging Sciences[edit]
- International Journal of Emerging Sciences (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Online journal started just this month. Too young to be notable yet. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Crusio (talk) 20:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 20:40, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 20:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as too early. I wish commercial spammers would not waste our time. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per WP:NJournals. I don't think the indexing listed is enough to convey notability (Google scholar indexes anything on the web that resembles a scientific paper, for instance) and there's nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sławomir Biały (talk) 02:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable --Reference Desker (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.