Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Institute for Learning

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

International Institute for Learning[edit]

International Institute for Learning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Zad68 15:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I found several reliable sources (mostly independed published works) that could prove useful:
    Ambriz, Rodolfo (2008). Dynamic Scheduling with Microsoft Office Project 2007. J. Ross Publishing. p. 4. ISBN 9781932159875.
    Blais, Steven (2011). Business Analysis: Best Practices for Success. John Wiley & Sons. p. 27. ISBN 9781118076002.
    Kerzner, Harold (2011). Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards. John Wiley & Sons. p. 329. ISBN 9781118026526.
    Schwalbe, Kathy (2010). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning. p. 325. ISBN 9781111221751.
    Cohen, Eli (2005). Where Parallels Intersect. Informing Science. p. 682. ISBN 9788392233701.
    Bolles, Dennis (2002). Building Project Management Centers of Excellence. Vol. 1. Amacom. p. 3. ISBN 9780814407172.
    Hope it helps. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21™ 04:09, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Hahc21 for doing some digging. Looking into the references you found, I see:

Cheers anyway... Zad68 04:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow Talk 05:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete as discussed above, no indepth sources. gnews reveals mainly PR style web references. LibStar (talk) 01:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete. Non-notable due to complete lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. My own Google search turned up nothing but first-party and tangential mentions like those listed above. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 01:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13. Snotbot  t • c »  16:52, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm not finding sufficient independent sources (i.e. those that don't use formulations like "our" or "are pleased to announce") to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 22:25, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/International_Institute_for_Learning&oldid=1137932511"